|
|
|
SECOND
OPINIONS Misunderstandings
frequently arise over second opinion referrals. However this should be a straightforward procedure which
benefits the patient, owner and referral veterinary surgeon as well as the
referring practice. The Royal
College of Veterinary Surgeons has laid down simple guidelines which should
ensure that difficulties need not arise. The
reasons Animals
may be referred for a second opinion for a variety of reasons. 1.
Because specialised diagnostic or therapeutic equipment is required to
confirm a diagnosis, or for specialised treatment.
The institutions most commonly involved with this group are the teaching
institutions (veterinary colleges) in the UK, registered veterinary hospitals
and specialist referral practices. 2.
To allow a veterinary surgeon with particular experience in one animal
species or one particular system to examine the animal and, using his or her
expert knowledge, to give a diagnosis and recommend treatment. 3.
In the really baffling case, where a diagnosis cannot be reached or where
treatment fails, to allow another veterinary surgeon to pass a second opinion. It is in the last section that
misunderstandings and ill feeling most commonly arise, for generally the second
opinion is another veterinary surgeon, possibly in a neighbouring practice, who
may appeal to the client more than the original veterinary surgeon.
The client may therefore wish to consult permanently with the second
practice. In
such cases, this is “succession “ rather than second opinion.
Again, a permanent change of veterinary surgeon can be accomplished
easily by following the guidelines laid down by the RCVS.
Owners should therefore be aware that by definition a second opinion
is strictly that, and that in most circumstances the referring veterinary
surgeon would be expected to institute treatment and to maintain progress
checks. The second opinion
veterinary surgeon will usually wish to be kept informed of progress, and this
should normally be done through the referring veterinary
surgeon rather than by direct contact between client and second opinion
veterinary surgeon. How to arrange (or approach) a second
opinion The suggestion of a second opinion will
often be volunteered by your veterinary surgeon who may not have drugs,
equipment or specialised knowledge. If
this is suggested, the owner is advised to take that advice and to put him or
herself entirely in the hands of the veterinary adviser. The owner may also request a second
opinion if reasonable progress is not being made with the case. The owner has every right to nominate a second opinion of
choice, but generally this should be done only with the full advice of the
attending veterinary surgeon who will have a fair idea of the capabilities and
limitations of individuals, either in the area or at the nearest institutions.
Thus, valuable time and expense may not be wasted.
A client must not attempt to obtain a second opinion from a new
veterinary surgeon without the full knowledge of the previous veterinary surgeon
and this, apart from the ethical aspects, has a very sound reason. Co-operation between referring and referee veterinary
surgeons allows transmission of vital information, thus saving unnecessary
repetition of x-rays, tests and treatment.
Additionally, the current treatment and any adverse drug reactions can be
reported, which obviously is essential for the animal’s well-being.
The referring veterinary surgeon will be expected to supply whatever
information is available about the case, including relevant past case history,
immediate past case history, including findings, treatment and response, x-rays,
laboratory and other test results. The owner will be required to attend
with the animal and only someone who is informed and reliable should accompany
the animal during its initial examination, since there are likely to be many
questions asked that only the owner can answer certainly. The owner may well have to be prepared to leave the animal
for a period of time with the second opinion veterinary surgeon in order to
enable further tests, observation or treatment to be done. The second opinion veterinary surgeon
will communicate with the owner preliminary
findings subject to further tests being done, but fuller details will be
given direct by the referee to the referring veterinary surgeon, together with
recommendations for treatment. Unless
otherwise instructed, no contact should be made by the owner to the second
opinion veterinary surgeon, except through the referring veterinary surgeon. |